Issue 1/2026

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Study Objectives. – 3. Literature Review. – 4. Research Methodology. – 5. Result and Discussion. – 6. Conclusions.

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Methodology. – 3. Analysis of Recent CAS and SFT Cases Involving Latvian Clubs. – 3.1. CAS 2024/A/10627 Valmiera FC v. Latvian Football Federation. – 3.2. The FK Liepāja cases SFT 4A_608/2024, SFT 4A_612/2024, and SFT 4A_614/2024. – 3.3. Comparative and Doctrinal Observations. – 4. Analysis of Recent CAS Cases Involving Ukrainian Clubs and Players. – 4.1. CAS 2023/A/9443 Anatoliy Tymoshchuk v. Ukrainian Association of Football (UAF). – 4.2. CAS 2023/A/10091 Karpaty FC LLC v FIFA & HNK Cibalia Vinkovci & FC Karpaty Halych. – 4.3. CAS 2021/A/7866 Taras Durai v. Ukrainian Association of Football. – 4.4. Comparative and Doctrinal Observations. – 5. Landmark CAS Cases: Broader Comparative Context. – 6. Discussion. – 7. Conclusion.

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Methodology. – 3. The Nature of Administrative and Judicial Proceedings Affecting The Child. – 3.1 Administrative Proceedings. – 3.2 Judicial Proceedings. – 4 The Child’s Right to Opinion And Expression in International Law Aand Related Issues. – 4.1 The Child’s Right to Express Their Views in Matters Concerning Them. – 5. The National Implementation of The Child’s Right to Be Heard: a Comparative Legislative and Judicial Perspective. – 6. Child Participation in Europe: Gaps in Practice Between Legal Promises and Everyday Realities. – 7. Conclusion.

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Methodology. – 3. Post-Soviet Period: From Administrative Control to Procedural Justice in Land Reform. – 4. Formalisation Without Market Efficiency: The Exercise of Land Use Rights as an Illusion of Marketability. – 5. Land Policy: The Failed Transformation into an Investment-Attractive Asset. – 6. Judicial and Administrative Remedies as a Driver of Farmland Turnover. – 7. Conclusions.

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Methods. – 3. Post-communist transitional challenges and the 3Rs of transitional justice: restorative, reconstructive and reconcilable. – 3.1. Amnesty for some crimes and pardoning others (Decree-Law No. 3/1990). – 3.2. Granting rights to persons persecuted for political reasons by the communist dictatorship (Decree-Law No. 118/30 March 1990) – 3.3. Honouring the memory of the heroes-martyrs and granting rights to the descendants and the wounded in the December 1989 Revolution (Law No. 42 of December 18, 1990) – 3.4. Gratitude for the heroic deeds of the martyr heroes (Law No. 341/12 July 2004 and Law No. 242/8 October 2021). – 3.5. Legal situation of residential buildings, transferred to state ownership (Law No. 112 of 25 November 1995) – 4. Lustration legislation initiatives in Romania. – 5. Preparations for the integration into the European and Euro-Atlantic structures. – 5.1. Regulating the statute of judges and prosecutors (Law 303/2004) – 5.2. Creating the Property Fund (2005) (Governmental Decision 1481/2005 on the Creation of the Property Fund) – 5.3. Extending the Study of Securitate Archives and the activity of the National Council for the Study of the Securitate Archives (GEO 149/2005 and GEO 16/2006) – 6. Creation of the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes in Romania (2005) and Presidential Commission for the Analysis of Communist Dictatorship in Romania (2006) –7. Conclusions.

1. Introduction – 2. Methodology – 3. Results – 4. Discussion – 5. Conclusions.

1. Introduction. – 2. Restrictions on share transfers. – 2.1. FDI and its relationship to restrictions on share transfers in Saudi Arabia. – 2.2. Drag-along and tag-along rights. – 2.2.1 Testing the enforceability of the ‘drag-along’ right in the English and French courts. – 2.3. The right of first refusal (ROFR). – 2.3.1 Judicial challenges to ROFR. – 3. Conclusions

1. Introduction. – 2. International Public-Private contract-based Arbitration. – 3. Overview of the concession agreement model. – 4. Subjective arbitrability in international commercial arbitration. – 5. Legal framework of the Republic of Kazakhstan and comparative analysis with the Kyrgyz Republic jurisdiction. – 6. Conclusions.

1. Introduction. – 2. Methodology. – 3. Literature Review. – 3.1. Overview of Legitimacy under Islamic Law. – 3.2. Legitimation under Islamic Law. – 3.3. Understanding Authority Moral Responsibility Under Islamic Law. – 3.4. Pursuit of Legitimacy through Modernisation and National Sovereignty. – 3.5. Consequences of Legitimacy and Legitimation for Social Justice and the SDGs. – 3.6. Islamic Approaches to Legitimacy versus Social Justice and their Relevance to International Frameworks. – 3.7. Legitimacy in Influencing Global/ Transnational Legal Discussions. – 4. Results And Discussion of the Findings. – 5. Implications of the Study, Policy Relevance, and Practical Impact. – 6. Conclusions.

1. Introduction. – 2. Objectives and Methodology. – 3. The Problematic of Corruption. – 4. Article 7 and 8 of the Directive in Light of the Romanian Criminal Law. – 5. Conclusions.

1. Introduction – 2. Literature Review – 3. Methodology and Research Methods – 4. Results and Discussions. – 4.1. Comparative Legal Frameworks on post-Mortem Dignity in the EU. – 4.1.1. Post-Mortem Dignity in EU and National Legal Frameworks. – 4.1.2. Legal and Political Challenges in Establishing a Harmonized Framework. – 4.2. Digital Inheritance and Post-Mortem Image Rights in the EU. – 4.2.1. Post-Mortem Rights in the Context of Digital Assets. – 4.2.2. Digital Risks: Data Misuse, Disinformation and Propaganda. – 4.3. Post-Mortem Justice in Contexts of Crisis: The Impact of European and International Public Law on Managing Mass Graves. – 4.3.1. Historical Context. – 4.3.2. Technological Advancements and Cultural Sensitivities. – 4.3.3. Forensic Technologies in Mass Grave Investigations. – 4.3.4. Comparative Table of Post-Mortem Rights in Selected Jurisdictions. – 4.4. Violation of Post-Mortem Rights During the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict Through Unsecured Social Media Platforms. – 4.4.1. Digital Warfare and the Visibility of the Dead. – 4.4.2. Response of the European Union to the Violation of post-Mortem Rights Through Unsecured Social Media Platforms. – 5. Conclusions.

1. Introduction. – 2. Methodology. – 3. Sources Review. – 4. The Extent of Government Liability for Nuclear Damage. – 4.1. In Support of Government Intervention to Compensate for Nuclear Damage. – 4.2. Opposition to Government Intervention in Nuclear Damage Compensation. – 4.3. Illustrative Examples from Legal Practice on Compensation for Nuclear Damage. – 5. Cases Of Direct Government Intervention to Compensate for Nuclear Damage. – 5.1. Government Intervention Where Operator-Based Compensation Is Insufficient. – 5.2. Government Intervention Where Operator Liability Is Excluded or Fully Exhausted. – 6. Compensation Funds and Operator Pool Mechanisms in Comparative Perspective. – 7. Conclusions.

1. Introduction. – 2. Methodology. – 3. Pattern of Tech Stalking: Tactics and Dynamics. – 3.1. Concept of Stalking under Lithuania’s law. – 3.2. Legal Qualification of Tech Stalking. – 3.3. Evidencing Technology Enabled Stalking. – 4. Conclusions.

1. Introduction. – 2. Methodology. – 3. Procedurally-Relevant Vulnerabilities - Conceptual Framework. – 3.1. Definition and Differentiations. – 3.2. Typology of Procedurally Relevant Vulnerabilities. – 4. Procedural Models for Child Participation. – 4.1. Adapted Criminal Procedure for Juvenile Offenders. – 4.2. Friendly (Sensitive / Protected) Procedure for Underaged Victims and Witnesses. – 4.3. General Comparative Description of the Structure of the Rights of the Child in Both Types of Procedures. – 5. Matrix of the Procedural Relevance of Certain Vulnerabilities per Type of Procedure. – 6. Conclusions.

1. Introduction. – 2. Methodology. – 3. Discussions. – 3.1. Conceptual and Legal Foundations. – 3.2. Legal and Institutional Framework for AI in Governance. – 3.2.1. The UAE Legal Framework. – 3.2.2. Comparative Perspectives. – 3.3. AI in Corporate Governance Practices. – 3.3.1. Boards Decision-Making. – 3.3.2. Auditing and Compliance. – 3.3.3. Shareholder and Employee Engagement. – 3.4. Obstacles to the Integration of AI in Corporate Governance. – 3.5. AI, Corporate Governance, and Sustainable Development. – 4. Conclusions.