1. Introduction. – 2. Objectives and Methodology. – 3. The Problematic of Corruption. – 4. Article 7 and 8 of the Directive in Light of the Romanian Criminal Law. – 5. Conclusions.
The research delves into the substantive changes outlined by the proposed provisions of the directive in reference to the phenomenon of bribery, analyzing its potential implications for the existing anti-corruption framework in Romania in view of the interplay between anti-corruption efforts and the broader legal framework, assessing how the proposed changes may contribute to a more transparent, accountable, and resilient legal system.
Method: Using a comparative approach, the authors analyze the provisions of Articles 7 and 8 of the proposed Directive in light of the relevant provisions of Romanian criminal law. At the same time, the authors argue that, given the institutional framework of Romanian anti-corruption efforts, the aforementioned regulation does not provide a clear advantage.
Results and conclusions: While acknowledging the multifaceted nature of anti-corruption endeavors, the authors conclude that the proposed versions of Articles 7 and 8 of the Anticorruption Directive will not have a significant impact on the corresponding norms of the Romanian Criminal law, while explaining why this could be viewed as both a positive and a negative fact.

