Issue 2/2021

In Editor-in-Chief’s Note you may find more about this issue content and some our news shared

Summary: 1. Introduction. The Role of Constitutional Justice in the Constitutional System of the Modern State and Some Methodological Remarks. – 2. Issues of Constitutional Justice Independence in Poland. – 2.1. Position of the Constitutional Tribunal (as a starting point). – 2.2. Changes in the Constitutional Judiciary introduced in 2015 and in the Following Years. – 2.3. Conclusion to Part I. – 3. Crises of Constitutional Justice in Ukraine. – 3.1. Position of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (short overview). – 3.2. The Crisis Situation of 2020-2021. – 3.3. Conclusion to Part II. –4. Common Features and Different Approaches to Resolving Crisis Situations in Poland and Ukraine. – 5. Conclusions.

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Proof as a Gradable Concept. – 3. Standards of Proof in Common Law Countries. – 4. Standards of Proof in Civil Law Countries. – 5. Is the Distinction Actually So Critical? – 6. Standards of Proof in Ukrainian Law. – 6.1. Recent Developments in Legislation and Jurisprudence. – 6.2. Lost Profit in Ukrainian Law. – 6.3. An O.J. Simpson Case Scenario in Ukraine? – 7. Conclusion.

Summary: 1. Introduction – 2. The Essence and Models of Proceedings Based on Newly Discovered or Exceptional Circumstances in the Criminal Procedure of Some European Countries. – 3. Procedural Features of the Proceedings Based on Newly Discovered or Exceptional Circumstances in the Criminal Justice System of Ukraine. – 4. The Concept, Tasks, Significance and the Structure of Proceedings Based on Newly Discovered and Exceptional Circumstances in the Criminal Procedure of Ukraine – 5. The Signs of Newly Discovered and Exceptional Circumstances in the Criminal Justice System of Ukraine – 6. The System of Newly Discovered and Exceptional Circumstances in the Criminal Procedural Law of Ukraine – 7. Conclusions

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Interpretation and Evaluation of the Results of Historical and Legal Comparison. – 3. Juvenile Justice Authorities of Ukraine and Poland in the 1920s: Experience of Comparison and Evaluation. – 4. Evaluation of the Results and Possibility of Forecasting. – 5. Conclusions

Summary: – 1. Introduction. – 2. Law versus Justice. – 3. Justice and the Function of Law. – 4. The Function of Law in the Retributive Judiciary in Slovakia. – 5. Final Evaluation.

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Technological Solutions for Justice in the Digital Age. – 3. Risks of Using Digital Instruments in the Justice System. – 4. Algorithmic Justice: Is It Possible? – 5. Conclusions.

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. General Approaches to Access to Justice in Environmental Disputes. – 3. Public Participation in Environmental Disputes in Ukraine. – 4. Concluding Remarks.

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Judicial Status of the CCU as a Body of Constitutional Jurisdiction. – 3. Legitimacy of Constitutional Courts and their Constituent Powers. – 4. Problems of Constitutional Complaint Realization in Ukraine. – 5. Concluding Remarks

Summary: 1. Introduction: The Legal Regime for Using Natural Healing Resources in Ukraine. – 2. Climate as a Healing Resource – 3. Legal Responsibility and Judicial Practice for Using Natural Healing Resources. – 4. Concluding Remarks.

Summary: – 1. Introduction. – 2. State Policy of Ukraine for Ensuring Environmental Rights. – 3. Environmental State Policy of Ukraine and Environmental Rights Protection. – 4. ECtHR Case-Law in Environmental Matters: Cases v. Ukraine. – 5. National Case-Law on Access to Justice on Environmental Issues. – 6. Concluding Remarks.