ISSN 2663-0583 (Online)
ISSN 2663-0575 (Print)
  • Home
  • PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF THE ROLE OF PARLIAMENTS IN MODERN DEMOCRACIES: ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRUST IN PARLIAMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN
"

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF THE ROLE OF PARLIAMENTS IN MODERN DEMOCRACIES: ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRUST IN PARLIAMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN

1. Introduction. – 2. The Development of Parliamentarism in Kazakhstan. – 3. Literature Review. – 4. Methodology. – 5. Findings and Discussion. – 6. Conclusions.

FULL TEXT

Full Text:

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-8.3-a000102
CITATIONS
VIEWS
2 541
HTML Abstract About Author(s) References Reviews Українською

  Background: In democratic societies governed by the rule of law, parliament plays a crucial
role by passing laws, holding the government accountable, expressing the will of the people, and
cooperating with local communities. However, the role of the legislative branch may vary
significantly depending on the political system of individual countries. Kazakhstan serves as a
case study of how the presidency and executive branch control the country's political life, and
the role of parliament is not yet fully defined, undergoing a process of transformation.
Therefore, it is crucial to understand people's perceptions of the role of parliament in the
context of reforms aimed at deepening the democratisation of society.
Methods: This study employs a quantitative research approach to examine public attitudes
towards Parliament, focusing on accountability and public trust. A survey conducted among
598 respondents resulted in an accurate representation of public opinion. The study aims to
assess trust in governmental entities, including Parliament; the perception of the authorities'
responsibility for Kazakhstan's socio-economic situation; and satisfaction with the current
Parliament's performance and the laws it has passed. The data were analysed using
descriptive statistics.
Results and conclusion: The findings indicate that public trust in the legislative body in
Kazakhstan is significantly lower than in the executive branch. According to the findings,
Parliament is perceived as having limited autonomy and influence in socio-economic
governance. Most respondents believe that the President and the government shape important
national decisions. The study further revealed that most respondents believe that
parliamentarians tend to represent the interests of the government or their political parties
rather than those of the voters. The findings also highlighted a substantial gap between 
lawmakers and the public, with many respondents not even knowing who their parliamentary
representatives are. These findings underscore the urgent need for reforms that improve
parliamentary oversight, legislative independence, and public communication. The study is
especially important in light of the government's broader commitment to the "Listening State"
initiative, which aims to increase public involvement in governance and decision-making.

Abstract

 Background: In democratic societies governed by the rule of law, parliament plays a crucial
role by passing laws, holding the government accountable, expressing the will of the people, and
cooperating with local communities. However, the role of the legislative branch may vary
significantly depending on the political system of individual countries. Kazakhstan serves as a
case study of how the presidency and executive branch control the country's political life, and
the role of parliament is not yet fully defined, undergoing a process of transformation.
Therefore, it is crucial to understand people's perceptions of the role of parliament in the
context of reforms aimed at deepening the democratisation of society.
Methods: This study employs a quantitative research approach to examine public attitudes
towards Parliament, focusing on accountability and public trust. A survey conducted among
598 respondents resulted in an accurate representation of public opinion. The study aims to
assess trust in governmental entities, including Parliament; the perception of the authorities'
responsibility for Kazakhstan's socio-economic situation; and satisfaction with the current
Parliament's performance and the laws it has passed. The data were analysed using
descriptive statistics.
Results and conclusion: The findings indicate that public trust in the legislative body in
Kazakhstan is significantly lower than in the executive branch. According to the findings,
Parliament is perceived as having limited autonomy and influence in socio-economic
governance. Most respondents believe that the President and the government shape important
national decisions. The study further revealed that most respondents believe that
parliamentarians tend to represent the interests of the government or their political parties
rather than those of the voters. The findings also highlighted a substantial gap between 
lawmakers and the public, with many respondents not even knowing who their parliamentary
representatives are. These findings underscore the urgent need for reforms that improve
parliamentary oversight, legislative independence, and public communication. The study is
especially important in light of the government's broader commitment to the "Listening State"
initiative, which aims to increase public involvement in governance and decision-making.

About Authors

References

 1. Abishev G, Kurmanov B and Sabitov Z, ‘Authoritarian Succession, Rules, and Conflicts:
Tokayev’s Gambit and Kazakhstan’s Bloody January of 2022 (Qandy Qantar)’ (2024)
40(6) Post-Soviet Affairs 429, doi:10.1080/1060586X.2024.2377929.
2. Convery A and others, ‘Questioning Scrutiny: The Effect of Prime Minister’s Questions
on Citizen Efficacy and Trust in Parliament’ (2021) 27(2) Journal of Legislative Studies
207, doi:10.1080/13572334.2020.1850010.
3. Dalmatov K and others, ‘Addressing Human Rights Violations in the Criminal Justice
System of Kazakhstan: The Role of the Prosecutor’s Office and a Call for Legislative
Reforms’ (2024) 7(3) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 63, doi:10.33327/AJEE-18-7.3-
a000323.
4. Fabbrini S, ‘Between Power and Influence: The European Parliament in a Dual
Constitutional Regime’ (2019) 41(3) Journal of European Integration 417, doi:10.1080/
07036337.2019.1599370.
5. Fowler FJ, Survey Research Methods (5th edn, SAGE Publications Inc 2014).
6. Gibson NS and King AS, ‘The Promise and Peril of Constituent Interactions: The
Determinants of Town Hall Participation Among Members of Congress’ (2024) 49(4)
Legislative Studies Quarterly 745, doi:10.1111/lsq.12454.
7. Hendriks CM and Kay A, ‘From “Opening Up” to Democratic Renewal: Deepening
Public Engagement in Legislative Committees’ (2019) 54(1) Government and
Opposition 25, doi:10.1017/gov.2017.20.
8. Hossain A, ‘Role of Parliament and Governance in Bangladesh: Problems and
Prospects’ (2023) 8(1) Journal of Public Policy and Administration 31,
doi:10.47604/jppa.1791.
9. Jaja TC and Aditya ZF, ‘Promoting the Good Governance by Advancing the Role of
Parliamentarians and the Term Offices Limitation (Comparing Nigeria and Indonesia)’
(2022) 7(1) Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 265, doi:10.15294/jils.v7i1.54776.
10. Kanapyanov T, ‘Role and Place of the Parliament of Kazakhstan in the System of Checks
and Balances’ (2018) 51(1) Communist and Post-Communist Studies 81,
doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.01.007.
11. Kassymbek A and others, ‘The Role of Parliament in the Sustainable Development of
the Country: Agenda for Kazakhstan’ (2019) 2 Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita 28,
doi:10.3280/RISS2019-002005.
12. Kembayev Z, ‘Recent Constitutional Reforms in Kazakhstan: A Move towards
Democratic Transition?’ (2017) 42(4) Review of Central and East European Law 294,
doi:10.1163/15730352-04204002.
13. Krol G, ‘Legislative Performance of the Russian State Duma: The Role of Parliament in
an Authoritarian Regime’ (2017) 33(4) East European Politics 450, doi:10.1080/
21599165.2017.1346504.
14. Krol G, ‘The Legislative Role of the Russian Duma and the Kazakh Mazhilis:
Authoritarianism and Power Sharing in Post-Soviet Eurasia’ (2021) 37(6) Post-Soviet
Affairs 559, doi:10.1080/1060586X.2021.1970956.
15. Kurmanov B, Selteyev U and Almaganbetov A, ‘“Listening State?”: Exploring Citizens’
Perceptions of Open Government in Tokayev’s Kazakhstan’ (2024) 43(2) Central Asian
Survey 235, doi:10.1080/02634937.2023.2268652.
16. Leston-Bandeira C, ‘Studying the Relationship between Parliament and Citizens’ (2012)
18(3-4) Journal of Legislative Studies 265, doi:10.1080/13572334.2012.706044.
17. Moulds S, ‘A Toolkit for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Parliamentary Public
Engagement’ (2023) 5 University of South Australia Law Review 1, doi:10.21913/
uslrunisalr.v5.1661.
18. Newton S, ‘The Constitutional Systems of the Independent Central Asian States: A
Contextual Analysis’ (2018) 16(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 686,
doi:10.1093/icon/moy023.
19. Ruelens A, Meuleman B and Nicaise I, ‘Examining Macroeconomic Determinants of
Trust in Parliament: A Dynamic Multilevel Framework’ (2018) 75 Social Science
Research 142, doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.05.004.
20. Shirikov A, ‘Who Gets Ahead in Authoritarian Parliaments? The Case of the Russian
State Duma’ (2022) 28(4) Journal of Legislative Studies 554, doi:10.1080/
13572334.2021.1940435.
21. Su Seo H and Raunio T, ‘Reaching out to the People? Assessing the Relationship
between Parliament and Citizens in Finland’ (2017) 23(4) Journal of Legislative Studies
614, doi:10.1080/13572334.2017.1396694.
22. Thibault H and Insebayeva S, ‘The Political System of Kazakhstan’ in Lempp J and
Mayer S (eds), Central Asia in a Multipolar World: Internal Change, External Actors,
Regional Cooperation (Springer Nature 2024) 39, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63727-8_3.
23. Tokayev KJ, ‘Lessons of “Tragic January”: National Unity as a Guarantee of
Independence : Speech at the Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan,
11 January 2022’ (Әділет, 2022) <https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K2200002022>
accessed 5 February 2025.
24. Toleubekov A, ‘Constitutional and Legal Status of the Parliament of the Republic of
Kazakhstan’ (PhD (Law) thesis, National Research University Higher School of
Economics 2015).
25. Turarbekova A and others, ‘Legal Frameworks for Combating Violence Against
Women in Kazakhstan: Analyzing Effectiveness and Implementation Gaps’ (2025) 8(1)
Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 264, doi:10.33327/AJEE-18-8.1-a000119.
26. van der Meer T, ‘In What We Trust? A Multi-Level Study into Trust in Parliament as
an Evaluation of State Characteristics’ (2010) 76(3) International Review of
Administrative Sciences 517, doi:10.1177/0020852310372450.
27. Whitmore S, ‘Performing Protest and Representation? Exploring Citizens’ Perceptions
of Parliament in Ukraine’ (2020) 36(1) East European Politics 86, doi:10.1080/
21599165.2019.1683543.

Reviews for article

Add a Review

Reviews are moderated and will be published after verification!
All comments not related to reviews of the article will be deleted!


АНОТАЦІЯ УКРАЇНСЬКОЮ МОВОЮ

Дослідницька стаття

СПРИЙНЯТТЯ ГРОМАДСЬКІСТЮ РОЛІ ПАРЛАМЕНТІВ У СУЧАСНИХ ДЕМОКРАТІЯХ: ПІДЗВІТНІСТЬ ТА ДОВІРА ДО ПАРЛАМЕНТУ В КАЗАХСТАНІ

АНОТАЦІЯ

 Вступ. У демократичних суспільствах, що керуються верховенством права, парламент

відіграє вирішальну роль, адже парламент приймає закони, забезпечує підзвітність уряду,

виражає волю народу та співпрацює з місцевими громадами. Однак роль законодавчої гілки

влади може суттєво відрізнятися залежно від політичної системи окремих країн.

Казахстан є прикладом того, як президент і виконавча влада контролюють політичне

життя країни, а роль парламенту ще не до кінця визначена і перебуває в процесі

трансформації. Тому вкрай важливо зрозуміти сприйняття людьми ролі парламенту в

контексті реформ, спрямованих на поглиблення демократизації суспільства.

Методи. У цьому дослідженні було застосовано кількісний підхід для того, щоб вивчити

ставлення громадськості до парламенту, увагу було зосереджено на підзвітності та

довірі. Опитування, проведене серед 598 респондентів, дало точне відображення

громадської думки. Мета статті – оцінити довіру до державних органів, зокрема до

парламенту, сприйняття відповідальності влади за соціально-економічну ситуацію в

Казахстані, а також визначити чи задоволена громадськість роботою нинішнього

парламенту та прийнятими ним законами. Дані були проаналізовані за допомогою

методів описової статистики.

Результати та висновки. Результати дослідження свідчать про те, що довіра громадськості

до законодавчого органу в Казахстані значно нижча, ніж до виконавчої гілки влади. Згідно з

результатами, парламент сприймається як такий, що має обмежену автономію та вплив у

соціально-економічному управлінні. Більшість респондентів вважають, що президент та уряд

формують важливі державні рішення. У роботі було також показано, що більшість

респондентів вважають, що парламентарі схильні представляти інтереси уряду або своїх

політичних партій, а не виборців. Результати дослідження також висвітлили суттєвий

розрив між законодавцями та громадськістю, оскільки багато респондентів навіть не знають,

хто є їхніми представниками в парламенті. Ці результати підкреслюють нагальну потребу в

реформах, які покращують парламентський нагляд, законодавчу незалежність та комунікації

з громадськістю. Ця стаття є особливо важливою з огляду на ширші зобов'язання уряду щодо

ініціативи «Держава, що слухає», метою якої є розширення участі громадськості в управлінні

та прийнятті рішень.

Ключові слова: парламент, Казахстан, громадська довіра, політична підзвітність,

реформа управління.

Keywords

parliamentKazakhstanpublic trustpolitical accountabilitygovernance reform.

Publication history


  • Date of submission: 08 Feb 2025

    Date of acceptance: 31 Mar 2025

    Online First publication: 12 Jun 2025

    Last Publication: 17 Aug 2025

    Whether the manuscript was fast tracked? - No

    Number of reviewer report submitted in first round: 2 reports

    Number of revision rounds: 1 round, last revised version submitted 27 Mar 2024
     

    Technical tools were used in the editorial process

    Plagiarism checks - Turnitin from iThenticate https://www.turnitin.com/products/ithenticate/

    Scholastica for Peer Review https://scholasticahq.com/law-reviews

How to cite it?


  • Ultanbayev A, Tolegen M, Smailova I, Kozhakhmetova A, Abilmazhina A and Sharapatov A,

    ‘Public Perceptions of the Role of Parliaments in Modern Democracies: Accountability and

    Trust an Parliament in Kazakhstan’ (2025) 8(3) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 152-75

    <https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-8.3-a000102>

    DOI https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-8.3-a000102

    Managing editor – Mag. Yuliia Hartman. English Editor – Julie Bold.

     

    Ukrainian Language Editor – Mag. Liliia Hartman.

Selected Articles

Latest Articles