
Mediation and Court in Ukraine: Perspectives on Interaction and Mutual Understanding
Summary: 1. Introductory Remarks on Mediation Development in Ukraine. – 2. The Theory and Legal Regulation of Mediation. – 3. How Courts Interpret Mediation in the Ukrainian Case-law. – 4. Some Reflections and Final Remarks.
Abstract
AJEE Collection of Articles on Mediation
In this note, the authors identify some problems concerning the introduction of mediation in Ukraine in terms of its use in the consideration and resolution of court cases. Despite the lack of clear legal regulation for mediation, courts in Ukraine still try to use this mechanism of pre-trial dispute resolution. Particular attention is paid
to the law enforcement activities of courts in criminal and administrative cases, in which courts try to equate the conciliation procedure with the mediation procedure. These approaches clearly follow from the Resolutions and Recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe and the settled case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) since, back in 1975, the ECtHR in its decision Golder v. The United Kingdom ruled that it is unlikely that the rule of law can be imagined without access to justice. However, the presumption that the courts are the main institution for resolving disputes continues to be undermined by the proliferation of alternative forms of dispute resolution, both agreement-based and judicial.
About Authors
Drozdov Oleksandr
Dr. Sc. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Criminal Proceeding Department,
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
o.m.drozdov@nlu.edu.ua
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-1272
Rozhnov Oleh
PhD (Law), Assoc. Prof., Civil Proceeding Department,
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
o.v.rozhnov@nlu.edu.ua
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7217-8153
Mamnitskyi Valeriy
PhD (Law), Assoc. Prof., Civil Proceeding Department,
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
v.yu.mamnytskyy@nlu.edu.ua
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1455-3883
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to express their endless gratitude to the reviewers of their contribution for their remarks and recommendations.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest or competing interests exist.
CONTRIBUTORSHIP
The authors contributed jointly to the intellectual discussion underlying this note; Oleksandr Drozdov is responsible for the literature exploration and writing; Oleh Rozhnov and Mamnitskyi Valeriy are both responsible for the data collection, analysis, and interpretation; all the co-authors take responsibility for the content of the paper. The content of the note was translated with the participation of third parties under the authors’ oversight.
References
- Decree of the President of Ukraine of 11 June 2021 ‘On the Strategy for Reforming the Judiciary, Judicial System and Related Legal Institutions for 2015-2020’ <https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/276/2015#Text> accessed 19 June 2021.
- Decree of the President of Ukraine of 11 June 2021 ‘On the Strategy for the Development of the Justice System and Constitutional Judiciary for 2021-2023’ <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/231/2021#n10> accessed 19 June 2021.
- Komarov V, Tsuvina T, ‘The Impact of the ECHR and the Case law of the ECtHR on Civil Procedure in Ukraine’ 2021 1(9) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 79-101. DOI: 10.33327/ AJEE-18-4.1-a000047.
- Izarova I, Nekrošius V, Vėbraitė V, Prytyka Y, ‘Legal, Social and Cultural Prerequisites for the Development of ADR Forms in Lithuania and Ukraine’ (2020) 116 Teise (Law) 8-23. https:// doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2020.116.1.
- Shako FK, ‘Mediation in the Courts’ Embrace: Introduction of Court-Annexed Mediation into the Justice System in Kenya’ (2017) 1 TDM: Mediation & ADR.
- Thompson PN, ‘Good Faith Mediation in the Federal Courts’ (2011) 26 (2) Ohio St J on Dispute Resolution 363.
- Sourdin T, Zeleznokow J, ‘Courts, Mediation and COVID-19’ Australian Business Law Review <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3595910> accessed 19 June 2021.
- Law of Ukraine ‘On Amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine (Concerning Justice)’ of 2 June 2016 <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1401-19#Text> accessed 19 June 2021.
- Constitution of Ukraine <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text> accessed 19 June 2021.
- Izarova I, Prytyka Yu, Kravtsov S, ‘Towards Effective Dispute Resolution: a Long Way of Mediation Development in Ukraine’ (2020) 29 (1) Asia Life Sciences 389-399.
- Law of Ukraine ‘On Social Services’ <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2671-19#Text> accessed 19 June 2021.
- Law of Ukraine ‘On Free Legal Aid’ <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3460-17#Text> accessed 19 June 2021.
Reviews for article
Add a Review
How to cite it?
-
O Drozdov, O Rozhnov, V Mamnitskyi ‘Mediation and Court in Ukraine: Perspectives on Interaction and Mutual Understanding’ 2021 3(11) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 181–190. DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18-4.3-n000082