ISSN 2663-0583 (Online)
ISSN 2663-0575 (Print)
  • Home
  • CONFRONTING TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATE CRIMES: URGENT GLOBAL MEASURES
"

CONFRONTING TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATE CRIMES: URGENT GLOBAL MEASURES

1. Introduction. – 2. Materials and methods. – 3. Discussion. – 3.1. Legal basis for the classification of criminal liability of transnational commercial legal entities. – 3.2. Principles regarding the applicable prosecution of the criminal liability of commercial legal entities. – 3.3. The demand for establishing globally harmonised sanctions regarding transnational prosecution concerning the criminal liability of commercial legal entities. – 4. Conclusions.

Full Text:

DOI

HTML Abstract About Author(s) References Reviews Українською

 

Abstract

 Background: In today's interconnected world, the global economy holds significant importance

due to its far-reaching impact on various aspects of the world. It provides emerging economies,
especially developing countries, access to larger markets and enhances substantial business
transactions requiring commercial legal entities to wield significant influence and power across
borders, leading to a surge in complex transnational crimes.
Methods: This qualitative systematic review paper overviews, analyses, and synchronises the
secondary sources relating to the prosecution of the criminal liability of commercial legal
entities. The outcomes cement the legal basis for the urgent need for globally harmonised
sanctions to prosecute commercial legal entities involved in transnational crimes effectively.
Results and conclusions: By exploring the nature and scope of these offences, the challenges in
enforcement, and the benefits of a unified approach, this research aims to provide a
comprehensive framework for international cooperation to uphold justice and integrity in
prosecuting the criminal liability of commercial legal entities. Through case studies, analysis of
existing legal structures, and recommendations for future actions, this study highlights the
necessity of global collaboration to establish harmonised sanctions and legal frameworks
relating to the prosecution of criminal liability among countries. In addition, it constitutes
some implications for changing the current situation of prosecuting criminal liability
worldwide, especially in countries that have yet to enter into signatories with other countries
to address transborder prosecution of criminal liability.

About Authors

 Khoat Van Nguyen

Ph.D. (Law), Rector, Hanoi Procuratorate University, Hanoi, Vietnam
xuankhoat208@gmail.com
Corresponding author, responsible for conceptualization, methodology, data curation,
resources, investigation, formal analysis and writing – original draft.
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Disclaimer: The author declare that his opinion and views expressed in this manuscript are
free of any impact of any organizations.

Copyright: © 2024 Khoat Van Nguyen. This is an open access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC BY 4.0), which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.

References

 1. Alldridge P, ‘The Changing Face of Corporate Criminal Liability in England and Wales’

(2017) 39 Archives de Politique Criminelle 163, doi:10.3917/apc.039.0163.
2. Arlen J, ‘Prosecuting Beyond the Rule of Law: Corporate Mandates Imposed through
Deferred Prosecution Agreements’ (2016) 8(1) Journal of Legal Analysis 191,
doi:10.1093/jla/law007.
3. Bernaz N, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability under International Law: The New TV SAL and
Akhbar Beirut SAL: Cases at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon’ (2015) 13(2) Journal of
International Criminal Justice 313, doi:10.1093/jicj/mqv014.
4. Bui S N, ‘Criminal Liability of Commercial Legal Entity in Vietnamese Law’ (2020) 498
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 54, doi:10.2991/
assehr.k.201205.010.
5. Clough J, ‘Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Criminal Liability: Old Challenges
in a Transnational World’ in Levy R and others (eds), New Directions for Law in
Australia: Essays in Contemporary Law Reform (ANU Press 2017) 163.
6. Cunningham LA, ‘Deferred Prosecutions and Corporate Governance: An Integrated
Approach to Investigation and Reform’ (2014) 66(1) Florida Law Review 1.
7. Datsiuk V and Nesterova I, ‘Sustainability Issues of Business Security in Ukraine: Risk
Factors of the Corporate Criminal Liability’ (2020) 116 Teisė 120, doi:10.15388/
Teise.2019.116.8.
8. Diamantis ME and Laufer WS, ‘Prosecution and Punishment of Corporate Criminality’
 
(2019) 15 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 453, doi:10.1146/annurev-
lawsocsci-101317-031212.
 
9. Díez CGJ, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in the Twenty-First Century: Are all
Corporations Equally Capable of Wrongdoing?’ (2011) 41(1) Stetson Law Review 41.
10. Dinh TM, ‘Provisions on Execution of Criminal Judgments against Commercial Legal
Entities Committing a Crime’ (2020) 11 Journal of Legal Studies - Hanoi Law University 59.
11. Do TP, ‘Criminal Prosecution Against the Crime of Legal Entities in Vietnam’ (2023)
39(1) VNU Journal of Science: Legal Studies 45, doi:10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4365.
12. Fairfax LM, ‘On the Sufficiency of Corporate Regulation as an Alternative to Corporate
Criminal Liability’ (2011) 41(1) Stetson Law Review 117.
13. Garrett BL, ‘International Corporate Prosecutions’ in Brown D, Turner J and Weisse B
(eds), Comparative Criminal Procedure (OUP 2018).
14. Gordillo RA, ‘Weaknesses in Spanish Jurisprudence on the Criminal Liability of Legal
Entities: Non-Imputability of Certain Legal Entities and Lack of Methodology When
Applying the Transfer of Criminal Liability between Corporations’ (2023) 3 Eucrim 293.
15. Henning PJ, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability and the Potential for Rehabilitation’ (2009)
46 American Criminal Law Review 1417.
16. Isroilov B, Alimov G and Toshev B, ‘Prosecution of Legal Entities: History, Theory,
Practice and Proposals’ (2021) 527 Advances in Social Science, Education and
Humanities Research 294, doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210322.127.
17. Jimenez GA, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability: Toward a Compliance-Orientated
Approach’ (2019) 26(1) Indiana Journal of Global Legal Indiana Journal of Global Legal
Studies 353.
18. Kelly MJ and Moreno-Ocampo L, ‘Modes of Criminal Liability under International
Law’ in Kelly MJ and Moreno-Ocampo L, Prosecuting Corporations for Genocide (OUP
2016) 73, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190238896.003.0004.
19. Kyriakakis J, ‘Prosecuting Corporations for International Crimes: The Role for
Domestic Criminal Law’ in May L and Hoskins Z (eds), International Criminal Law and
Philosophy (CUP 2009) 108.
20. Lambridis P, ‘Corporate Accountability: Prosecuting Corporations for the Commission
of International Crimes of Atrocity’ (2021) 53(1) NYU International Law and Politics 144.
21. Lederman E, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability: The Second Generation’ (2016) 46(1)
Stetson Law Review 71.
22. Long-Sutehall T, Sque M and Addington-Hall J, ‘Secondary Analysis of Qualitative
Data: A Valuable Method for Exploring Sensitive Issues with an Elusive Population?’
(2010) 16(4) Journal of Research in Nursing 335, doi:10.1177/1744987110381553.
23. Mai DB, ‘Supervising the Investigation of Criminal Cases Committed by Commercial
Legal Entities under the Regulation of Vietnam Criminal Procedure Code’ (2021) 12(3)
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI) 3095.
24. Mrabure KO and Abhulimhen-Iyoha A, ‘A Comparative Analysis of Corporate
Criminal Liability in Nigeria and Other Jurisdictions’ (2020) 11(2) Beijing Law Review
429, doi:10.4236/blr.2020.112027.
25. Nguyen H, Mai VT and Tran TH, ‘The Criminal Liability of Commercial Legal Entities
in the Current Criminal Code of Vietnam’ (2022) 2(40) Law & Social Bonds 185,
doi:10.36128/priw.vi40.398.
26. Nguyen TPH, ‘A Scientific Understanding of Conditions for a Commercial Legal Entity
to be Criminally Charged under the Current Criminal Code’ (2022) 38(2) VNU Journal
of Science: Legal Studies 60, doi:10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4454.
27. Pieth M and Ivory R, ‘Emergence and Convergence: Corporate Criminal Liability
Principles in Overview’ in Pieth M and Ivory R (eds), Corporate Criminal Liability:
Emergence, Convergence, and Risk (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and
Justice (IUSGENT, vol 9), Springer Dordrecht 2011) 3, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0674-3_1.
28. Podgor ES, ‘Introduction: Corporate Criminal Liability 2.0’ (2016) 46(1) Stetson Law
Review 1.
29. Pouncy CRP, ‘Reevaluating Corporate Criminal Responsibility: It’s All About Power’
(2011) 41(1) Stetson Law Review 97.
30. Sánchez González A, ‘The Criminal Liability of Corporations: A Step Forward in the
Implementation of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human
Rights’ (2019) 12(1) Mexican Law Review 91, doi:10.22201/iij.24485306e.2019.2.13640.
31. Smith SF, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability: End it, Don’t Mend it’ (2022) 47(4) Journal of
Corporation Law, 1089.
32. Teichmann F, Wittmann C and Boticiu S, ‘Compliance as a form of Defense against
Corporate Criminal Liability’ (2023) 1 Journal of Economic Criminology 100004,
doi:10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100004.
33. Thompson RC, Ramasastry A and Taylor MB, ‘Transnational Corporate Responsibility
for the 21st Century: Translating Unocal: The Expanding Web of Liability for Business
Entities Implicated in International Crimes’ (2009) 40(4) George Washington
International Law Review 841.
34. Toleubai AM and Kizdarbekova AS, ‘The Concept of Commercial Legal Entities in
Kazakhstan and Foreign Legislation’ (2018) 9(7) Journal of Advanced Research in Law
and Economics 2437, doi:10.14505//jarle.v9.7(37).31.
35. Tommaso AD, Corporate Liability and International Criminal Law (Routledge 2023)
doi:10.4324/9781003390534.
36. Uhlmann DM, ‘Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements and the
Erosion of Corporate Criminal Liability’ (2013) 72(4) Maryland Law Review 1295.
37. Wagner RE, ‘Corporate Criminal Prosecutions and the Exclusionary Rule’ (2016) 68(4)
Florida Law Review 1119.
38. Wattad MSA, ‘Natural Persons, Legal Entities, and Corporate Criminal Liability under
the Rome Statute’ (2016) 20(2) UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 391.
39. Werle N, ‘Prosecuting Corporate Crime when Firms are Too Big to Jail: Investigation,
Deterrence, and Judicial Review’ (2019) 128(5) The Yale Law Journal 1366.
40. Wilt H, ‘Corporate Criminal Responsibility for International Crimes: Exploring the
Possibilities’ (2013) 12(1) Chinese Journal of International Law 43, doi:10.1093/
chinesejil/jmt010.
41. Zerk J, Corporate Liability for Gross Human Rights Abuses: Towards a Fairer and More
Effective System of Domestic Law Remedies: A Report Prepared for the Office of the UN
High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR 2012).

Reviews for article

Add a Review

Reviews are moderated and will be published after verification!
All comments not related to reviews of the article will be deleted!

 Вступ. У сучасному взаємопов’язаному світі глобальна економіка має важливе значення

через свій широкомасштабний вплив на різні аспекти життя. Вона надає країнам, що
розвиваються, доступ до більших ринків і сприяє значним бізнес-операціям, що вимагають
від комерційних юридичних осіб мати значний вплив і силу за межами національних кордонів,
що призводить до зростання складних транснаціональних злочинів.
Методи. У цій якісній систематичній оглядовій роботі здійснюється огляд, аналіз і
синхронізація вторинних джерел, що стосуються притягання до кримінальної
відповідальності комерційних юридичних осіб. Результатами дослідження було
підтверджено правову основу для нагальної необхідності глобально гармонізованих санкцій, що дадуть змогу ефективно переслідувати комерційні юридичні особи, причетні
до транснаціональних злочинів.
Результати та висновки. У роботі досліджується природа та обсяг цих правопорушень,
виклики у їхньому застосуванні, а також переваги єдиного підходу. Оглядова стаття має
на меті надати всебічну основу для міжнародної співпраці, щоб дотримуватись
справедливості та доброчесності під час притягнення до кримінальної відповідальності
комерційних юридичних осіб. Завдяки тематичним дослідженням, аналізу наявних
правових структур і рекомендацій для майбутніх дій, у цьому дослідженні підкреслюється
необхідність глобальної співпраці для встановлення гармонізованих санкцій та правових
меж, що стосуються притягнення до кримінальної відповідальності між країнами. Крім
того, дослідження містить деякі пропозиції щодо зміни стосовно зазначеного питання у
світі, особливо в країнах, які ще не підписали міжнародні угоди з іншими країнами для
вирішення проблеми з транскордонним притягненням до кримінальної відповідальності.

Keywords

  • harmonised sanctions, criminal liability, commercial legal entities, transnational crimes, legal frameworks.

Publication history

  •  Date of submission: 05 Jun 2024

    Date of acceptance: 05 Aug 2024

    Date of Online First publication: 02 Sep 2024

    Date of publication: 15 Nov 2024

    Whether the manuscript was fast tracked? - No

    Number of reviewer report submitted in first round: 2 reports

    Number of revision rounds: 1 round, revised version submitted 05 Aug 2024

How to cite it?

  • Van Nguyen K, ‘Confronting Transnational Corporate Crimes: Urgent Global Measures’ (2024) 7(4) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 421-46 <https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.4-a000106>