The Theory and Practice of Precedent in International Adjudication: A View from Ukraine
Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. A Modern Approach of the Nature and Classification of Precedents of International Adjudicative Bodies. – 3. Horizontal Interaction of Institutions of International Adjudication as a Type of Precedent. – 4. Concluding Remarks.
Abstract
This article argues that legal pragmatism and realism are the methodological basis for considering the law-making function of international courts. Classical scientific approaches, the representatives of which view courts only as applicators of the law, do not allow research into the nature and role of international adjudicative bodies.
Since there are several positions on the nature, content, and legal force of the precedent decisions of international adjudicative bodies (the are both diametrically opposed and, to some extent, similar), the author takes a position that considers the characteristics of modern international relations.
The author proposes to classify international judicial precedents by considering the construction of judicial institutions and the legal force of decisions because these criteria reflect the nature and significance of such decisions.
The classification divides precedents into vertical and horizontal (persuasive). The author argues that vertical precedent set by a particular body of international justice can be absolute, i.e., a structurally lower judicial body can, under no circumstances and exceptions, make a decision without taking into account the legal conclusions made by the higher judicial body. Vertical international judicial precedent may also be relative, i.e., in certain circumstances, a higher judicial body may make a different decision in a similar case, which suggests no obligation to be bound by its own previous decisions.
Analysis of the decisions of many international courts has led to the conclusion that international courts create judicial precedents of persuasive content. In particular, the author uses decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) that contain citations of the Court’s own legal positions and the International Court of Justice’s legal positions. It is proved that the so-called horizontal precedent is a persuasive precedent, the content of the legal provisions of which is based on the authority of the cited international court’s decisions.
Thus, international judicial precedent not only exists but must be recognised legally because only the formal enshrinement of the legal force of such decisions will lead to the recognition of judicial precedent as a formal source of international law.
About Authors
Boyko Inna
Assoc. Prof. at the Maritime Law Department National University
‘Odessa Maritime Academy’, Ukraine
innaboyko@onma.edu.ua
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-2666
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The author declares no conflict of interest of relevance to this topic.
DISCLAIMER
The author declares that she was not involved in any state bodies, courts, or any other organisations’ activities related to the views and case-law discussed.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to express her gratitude to the reviewers and editors of the journal and to the English editor, Sarah White.
References
1. Aspremont J, Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford University Press 2011).
2. Alexander LA, Sherwin E, ‘Judges as Rulemakers’ (2004) 15 University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series 1-35.
3. Bobechko N, Voinarovych A, Fihurskyi V, ‘Newly Discovered and Exceptional Circumstances in Criminal Procedure of Some European States’ 2021 2 (10) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 44-66.
4. Boschiero N, Scovazzi T, Pitea C, Ragni C (eds), International Courts and the Development of International Law. Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (TMC Asser Press 2013).
5. Boyle A, Chinkin C, The Making of International Law (Oxford University Press 2007).
6. Butkevich VG (ed), International law. Fundamentals of theory: A textbook (Lybid 2002).
7. Craig P, Harlow C (eds), Lawmaking in the European Union (Kluwer Law International 1998).
8. Didych T, ‘Judicial Law-making and Its Regulation in Independent Ukraine: Its History and Development’ 2021 3 (11) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 82-100.
9. Dworkin R, Justice in Robes (Harvard University Press, 2006).
10. Dworkin R, Taking Right Seriously (Bloomsbury Academic 2013).
11.Feldman SM, ‘The Return of the Self, or Whatever Happened to Postmodern Jurisprudence’ (2017) 9 (2) Washington University Jurisprudence Review 267-294.
12.French D, Saul M, White ND (eds), International Law and Dispute Settlement: New Problems and Techniques (Hart Publishing 2012).
13.Gao H, ‘Dictum on Dicta: Obiter Dicta in WTO Disputes’ (2018) 17 (3) World Trade Review 509-533.
14.Guillaume G, ‘The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators’ (2011) 2 (1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5-23.
15. Guralenko NA, ‘Judicial precedent in a system of legislative sources: Philosophical and legal aspects’ (PhD (Law) thesis abstract, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs 2009).
16. Goldsmith JL, Posner EA, The Limits of International Law (1st ed, Oxford University Press 2006).
17. Heffernan LA, ‘Discretionary Jurisdiction for the European Court of Justice?’ (1999) 34 Irish Jurist 148-169.
18. Holmes OW, The Path of the Law (Martino Fine Books 2012).
19. Jacob M, ‘Precedents: Law-making Through International Adjudication’ (2011) 12 (5) German Law Journal 1005-1032.
20.Khronovski N, ‘Forming a single European standard of human rights: The accession of the European Union to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’ (2013) 1 Yevropeysʹke pravo 14-27.
21. Kiyivets O, ‘Methodology of international law in the context of the study of sources of international law: Some general reflections on the eternal’ (2012) 1-2 Ukrayinsʹkyy chasopys mizhnarodnoho prava 42-46
22. Komárek J ‘Reasoning with Previous Decisions: Beyond the Doctrine of Precedent’ (2013) 61 The American Journal of Comparative Law 148-161.
23. Komarova TV, The Court of Justice of the European Union: The development of the judicial system and the practice of interpreting EU law (Pravo 2018).
24. Langdell CC, A summary of the law of contracts (Little, Brown, and Company 1880).
25. Linaki E, ‘Judicial Decisions. What kind of Sources of International Law’ (2013) 2 Lex-warrier 13-17.
26. Markel A, ‘American, English and Japanese warranty law compared: Should the U.S. reconsider her article 95 declaration to the CISG?’ (2009) 21 Pace Int’l L. Rev 163-204.
27. Moskalenko OM, ‘Sources of European Union law (international legal analysis)’ (PhD (Law) thesis abstract, Legislation Institute of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine 2006).
28. Murphy T, ‘Postmodernism: Legal theory, legal education and the future’ (2000) 7 (3) International Journal of the Legal Profession 357-379.
29. Prylutsky S, ‘Judicial policy: Legal nature, place and role in the political system of the state’ (2008) 1 Sudova apelyatsiya 26-33.
30. Ridi N, ‘“Mirages of an Intellectual Dreamland”? Ratio, Obiter and the Textualization of International Precedent’ (2019) 10 (3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 361-395.
31. Ridi N, ‘Doing things with international precedents: The use and authority of previous decisions in international adjudication’ (PhD (Law) thesis, King’s College London 2019).
32. Ridi N, ‘The Shape and Structure of the “Usable Past”: An Empirical Analysis of the Use of Precedent in International Adjudication’ (2019) 10 (2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 200-247.
33. Romano C, ‘The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle’ (1999) 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Policy 709-751.
34. Romanyuk YM, ‘Judicial lawmaking in the context of justice reform: Problem statement’ (2016) 10 Law of Ukraine 9-19.
35. Shevchuk SV, Judicial lawmaking: World experience and prospects in Ukraine(Referat 2007).
36. Von Bogdandy A, Venzke I (eds), International Judicial Lawmaking (Springer 2012).
37. Wolfrum R, Gätzschmann I (eds), International Dispute Settlement: Room for Innovations? (Springer 2013).
38. Yamkovyy V, ‘Introduction of judicial precedent as a necessary element of harmonization of Ukrainian legislation with European legal systems’ (2009) 2 Comparative legal research 25-30.
Reviews for article
Add a Review
How to cite it?
-
I Boyko, ‘The Theory and Practice of Precedent in International Adjudication: A View from Ukraine’ 2021 4(12) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 48–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-4.4-a000084
