The Applicability of the Right to a Fair Trial in Civil Proceedings: the Experience in Ukraine
Summary: 1. Introduction – 2. The Legal Nature of the Right to a Fair Trial – 3. The scope of the Applicability of the Right to a Fair Trial – 3.1. Legally Bound Subjects – 3.2. The dispute over the Right as the Measure of Applicability – 3.3. The diversification of Judicial Procedures – 3.4. The civil nature of the Rights and Duties as the Protection Objects. – 4. Conclusions.
Abstract
In this note, the author attempts to prove that the right to a fair trial is essentially a substantive right; that is, a right that combines the manifestations of a fundamental right. At the same time, this right imposes some positive duties on the State to provide for it. It has national and supranational regulations, and at the same time reflects subjective law and axioms, as well as elements of procedural and substantive law. Attention is drawn to the fact that in Ukraine the legal nature of this right is implemented only partially, since neither legislation nor judicial practice recognize it as an independent object of protection.
Taking into account the provisions of Para 1, Art. 6 of the ECHRs and the case law of the ECtHR , the research proposes to define the scope of the applicability of the right to a fair trial proceeding from: (1) legally bound subjects, which may include not only courts within the judicial system of the country concerned on the basis of the law, but also other jurisdictional and quasi-judicial bodies; and (2) the procedures in which the guarantees of a fair trial must be observed. Depending on the existence or absence of a dispute over the rights in them the latter is divided into ‘disputed’, ‘conditionally disputed’ or ‘indisputable’. It is proved that the requirements of Art. 6, Para 1 of the ECHR do not apply to them, but that they are mandatory under the first two procedures. An attempt to analyse the recent positions of the ECtHR on the possibility of including protection measures in the scope of the application is made. Also, the author determines which of those protection measures provided in national law falls within the scope of this regulation. Furthermore, the author draws attention to the fact that the rights and duties to protect a person who is invoked must be ‘civil in nature’ in order to be covered by the guarantees of a fair trial. On the basis of certain criteria the author identifies procedures in the national legal system within which the right to a fair trial must be guaranteed.
About Authors
CONTRIBUTOR
The author is solely responsible for the reading and the approval of the final version and has agreed to be accountable for all aspects of this note.
Sakara Natalia is a PhD in Law, Associated Professor, Judge of Supreme Court.
Sakaranatasha@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-3756
ACKOWLEDGMENTS
The author would like to express her endless gratitude to the reviewers and the English editors for their help.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author has declared that no conflict of interest or competing interests exist, in particular, within her activities as a
judge of the Supreme court. This study was solely a result of the author’s academic research.
References
Lautenbach G, The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights (OUP 2013) 174;
Thurman WA, ‘The Role of Substantive Law and Procedure in the Legal Process’ (1932) XLV (4) Harward Law Review 639, 643-644.
Yukov MK, ‘Civil Procedural Law. Issues of development and protection of citizens' rights’ [‘Sviazy norm hrazhdanskoho y hrazhdanskoho protsessualnoho prava. Voprosi razvytyia i zashchyti prav hrazhdan: mezhvuz. temat. sb.’] (RE Gukasian ed, Kaliningradskiy Gos. Universitet 1977) 66-75.
Temirbekov JR, ‘Some features of understanding the rule of law in US constitutional theory’ [‘Nekotorye osobennosti ponymaniya verkhovenstva prava v konstitutsyonnoi teorii ‘] (2015) 1 (66) Law and State 53-54.
Sviridenko OM, ‘Substantive legal relations as an integral part of the insolvency (bankruptcy) concept’ [‘Substantyvnye pravootnoshenyia kak sostavnaia chast kontseptsyy nesostoiatelnosty (bankrotstva)’] (2010) 11 Modern law 76-77.
Savchenko SA, ‘Interaction Process of norms and principles of international and national law’ [‘Protsess vzaymodeistvyia norm y pryntsypov mezhdunarodnoho y natsyonalnoho prava’] (2010) 3 Gazette of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 154.
Sahnova TV, ‘Right to Judicial Protection as a Substantive Procedural Law: The Effect of Globalization’ [‘Pravo na sudebnuiu zashchytu kak substantyvnoe protsessualnoe pravo: effekt hlobalyzatsyy’] (2014)3 The Bulletin of Civil Procedure 11-25.
European Commission For Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), Report on the Rule of Law. Venice, 25-26 March 2011 <http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-rus> accessed 6 February 2021.
Sakara NY, ‘Impact of the human rights fundamentalization on the development of the fair trial right’ [‘Vplyv fundamentalizatsii prav liudyny na stanovlennia prava na spravedlyvyi sudovyi rozghliad’] (2017) 138 Problemy Zakonnosti 43-54.
Prokopenko OB, The fair trial right: conceptual analysis and implementation practice [Pravo na spravedlyvyi sud: kontseptualnyi analiz i praktyka realizatsii] (Publishing House FINN 2011) 63.
Sakhnova TV, ‘Procedure of the Civilistic Process: Future Methodology’ [‘Protsedurnost tsyvylystycheskoho protsessa: metodolohyia budushcheho'] (2012) 1 Bulletin of the Civil Process 13-14.
Komarov VV et al, Civic Process Course: Textbook [Kurs tsyvilnoho protsesu: pidruchnyk] (Law 2011) 17.
Tsuvina TA, ‘Peculiarities of the calculation of the reasonable period of civil proceedings in the context of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ [‘Osoblyvosti obchyslennia rozumnoho stroku sudovoho rozghliadu tsyvilnykh sprav u konteksti praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny’] (2015) 130 Problems of Legality 98.
Sakhnova TV, ‘Civic Process Course: Theoretical Beginnings and Basic Institutions’ [‘Kurs hrazhdanskoho protsessa: teoretycheskye nachala y osnovnыe institutu’] (Wolters Kluwer 2008) 14.
Marmazov V, Pushkar P, ‘Is there a right to a fair arbitration guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights?’ [‘Chy isnuie pravo na spravedlyvyi arbitrazhnyi rozghliad sprav, harantovanyi yevropeiskoiu konventsiieiu z prav liudyny’] (2011) 1 Law of Ukraine 37-49.
Turkanova V, ‘Open Enforcement: New Approach of Ukraine in Access to Justice’ (2019) 2 Access to Justice in Eastern Europe.
Sakara NY, ‘Content and Legal Nature of Legal Dispute’ [‘Zmist ta pravova pryroda yurydychnoho sporu’] (2017) 46 Uzhgorod National University Scientific journal. Series: Law 63-68.
Komarov VV et al, Claim proceeding: monograph [‘Pozovne provadzhennia: monohrafiia’] (Law 2011) 7
Izarova I , Prytyka Yu, ‘Simplified action proceedings of the civil procedure of Ukraine: challenges of the first year of implementation’ Problems of Legality [‘Sproshchene pozovne provadzhennia tsyvilnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy: vyklyky pershoho roku zastosuvannia v sudovii praktytsi’], No 145, 2019, Pp. 51-67.
Korol D, ‘The Value of the Case for the Applicant: A Criterion for the Differentiation of Case Proceedings or of Access to Justice?’ Teisė, 2020, 1140, Pp. 154-160. Doi: 10.15388/Teise.2020.114.11.
Sakara NY, ‘Simplified Proceedings as a novelty of Civil Procedure Law’ [‘Sproshchene pozovne provadzhennia yak novela tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho prava’] Problems of Civil Law and Procedure: Scientific-practical conference, Kharkiv, 25 May 2018.
Silvestri E, ‘Small Claims and Procedural Simplification: Evidence from Selected EU Legal System’ (2018) 1 Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 6-14
Izarova I, Flejszar R, Vebraite V, ‘Aссess to Justice in Small Claims Procedure: Comparative Study of Civil Procedure in Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine’ International Journal of Procedural Law, Volume 9 (2019), No 1, Pp. 97-117.
Tsuvina TA, Trial Right in civil proceedings: monograph [‘Pravo na sud u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi: monohrafiia’] (Word 2015) 67-68.
Komarov VV, Civil procedural legislation in the dynamics and practice of the Supreme Court of Ukraine [Tsyvilne protsesualne zakonodavstvo u dynamitsi rozvytku ta praktytsi Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy] (Law 2012) 45.
Komarov VV et al, Court Administration of Ukraine: Basic State University: Monograph [‘Tsyvilne sudochynstvo Ukrainy: osnovni zasady ta instytuty: monohrafiia’] (Law 2016) 605.
Udaltsova IV, ‘Separate proceedings and problems of recognition of a citizen as having limited legal capacity or incapacity’ [‘Okreme provadzhennia ta problemy vyznannia hromadianyna obmezheno diiezdatnym chy nediiezdatnym’] (Cand of Law thesis, Kharkiv 1999) 4, 10
Stefan MI, Civil Procedure Law of Ukraine: Academic course: Textbook for students (Publishing House Book In Jure 2005) 434-435 ff.
Tertyshnikov VI, Civil Process of Ukraine [Tsyvilnyi protses Ukrainy], 4th ed(Publishing house ‘Jurait’, 2012) 226; DM Chechot, Non-Сontentious Proceeding [‘Neyskovye proyzvodstva’] (Publishing house of Law Faculty of St. Petersburg State University 2005) 448 ff.
Clayton R, Tomlinson H, Fair Trial Rights, 2nd ed (Oxford University Press 2010) 197.
Reviews for article
Add a Review
Keywords
- a right to a fair trial, substantive law, scope of applicability of the fair trial right, court, established by law, judicial procedures, legal dispute, diversification of judicial procedures, ‘civilistic’ rights and duties
How to cite it?
- N Sakara ‘The Applicability of the Right to a Fair Trial in Civil Proceedings: the Experience in Ukraine’ 2021 1(9) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 199–222. DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18-4.1-n000053
