Protecting the Fundamental Rights of the Child by Criminalising the Voluntary Incestuous Relations
Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. The Main International Instruments Meant to Protect the Rights of the Child. – 3. The Problem of Voluntary Incestuous Intercourse between Adults and Minors. – 4. The Purpose of Criminalising the Incestuous Intercourse between Direct Relatives and Siblings. – 5. Conclusions.
Abstract
Background: The notion that incest is an extremely widespread problem in contemporary society has been rejected by most of the scientific community until the last couple of decades. Therefore, legal professionals and national legislators have only recently begun to understand the need to act in order to prevent the long-lasting, harmful effects that such relations might have upon the participants.
Methods: In order to achieve the main objective of this paper, the authors have reviewed a selection of primary sources (mainly legal norms included in various national and international legal instruments). They have also consulted secondary sources, trying to obtain the relevant interdisciplinary data from legal, historical, and psychological studies. This paper does not intend to outline the complete state of the art concerning studies on the phenomenon of incest, therefore only the most relevant data regarding the prevention of incest by the enactment of the norms on the protection of the fundamental rights of the children have been collected. The goal of this paper is to present a few considerations regarding the link between the implementation of the fundamental rights of the child and the criminalisation of incestuous relations between members of the same nuclear family.
Results and Conclusion: The results of this brief study are worrisome, to say the least, as it appears that the states that are actively promoting the rights of the children also have a veritable tradition of denying the extent of the phenomenon of incest and actively and/or passively ignore its perils.
About Authors
Manea Teodor
Associate Lecturer, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
Competing interests: There are no competing interest to mention.
Coordinating-Member, Department for Transitional Justice and Legal Theory, Center for Ethics, Law and Education
Constantinescu-Mărunțel Cătălin
catalin.constantinescu@drept.unibuc.ro
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9680-0018
Co-author, responsible for writing.
Disclaimer: Both authors declare that their opinion and views expressed in this manuscript are free of any impact of any organizations.
Managing editor – Dr. Serhii Kravtsov. English Editor – Dr. Sarah White.
Copyright: © 2022 T Manea, C Constantinescu-Mărunțel. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
References
- Bell V, Interrogating Incest. Feminism, Foucault and the Law (Routledge 1993).
- Constantinescu-Mărunțel C, ‘The Rather Ambiguous Notion of Justice Utilised by the European States’ (2020) 10 Union of Jurists of Romania. Law Review 53.
- Dellavalle S, ‘Reconciliation v. Retribution, and Co-Operation v. Substitution: Hegel’s Suggestions for a Philosophy of International Criminal Law’ in Morten Bergsmo and Emiliano J Buis (eds), Philosophical Foundations of International Criminal Law: Correlating Thinkers (Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher 2018).
- Forward S and Buck C, Betrayal of Innocence. Incest and Its Devastation (Penguin 1984).
- Herman JL, Father-Daughter Incest (Harvard University Press 2003).
- Graham Hughes, ‘The Crime of Incest’ 55 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 322.
- Kettunen M, Legitimizing European Criminal Law. Justification and Restrictions (Springer 2020).
- Mitrache C and Mitrache C, Drept Penal Român. Partea Generală (Third edition, Universul Juridic 2019).
- O’Reilly M, ‘Is Adult Incest Wrong?’ [2015] Humanism Ireland 18.
- Rachman AW and Klett SA, Analysis of the Incest Trauma. Retrieval, Recovery, Renewal (Karnac Books 2015).
- Russell DEH, Behind Closed Doors in White South Africa. Incest Survivors Tell Their Stories (Macmillan Press Ltd 1997).
- Sacco L, Unspeakable: Father-Daughter Incest in American History (The Johns Hopkins University Press 2009).
- Shor E and Simchai D, ‘Incest Avoidance, the Incest Taboo, and Social Cohesion: Revisiting Westermarck and the Case of the Israeli Kibbutzim’ (2009) 114 American Journal of Sociology 1803.
- Stevenson K ‘“These Are Cases Which It Is Inadvisable to Drag into the Light of Day”: Disinterring the Crime of Incest in Early Twentieth-Century England’ 20 Crime, History and Societies <https://journals.openedition.org/chs/1669?lang=en> accessed 4 January 2022.
- Streteanu F and Nițu D, Drept Penal. Partea Generală (Universul Juridic 2014).
- Criminal codes of OSCE participating states <https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes> accessed June 2021.
- League of Nations, Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child <http://www.un-documents.net/gdrc1924.htm> accessed 23 June 2021.
- United Nations, General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child <https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx> accessed 23 June 2021
- United Nations, General Assembly, Resolution 1386(XIV). Declaration of the Rights of the Child <https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38e3.html> accessed 23 June 2021.
- United Nations, Status of the Convention on the Rights of the Child <https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en> accessed 24 June 2021.
Reviews for article
Add a Review
How to cite it?
-
T Manea, C Constantinescu-Mărunțel ‘Protecting the Fundamental Rights of the Child by Criminalising the Voluntary Incestuous Relations’ 2022 1 (13) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 127-141. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.1-000100
