Summary: 1. Preconditions for the problem of effective resolution of civil disputes in Ukraine. – 2. Methodology for applying artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms for effective resolution of civil disputes. – 3. Conclusions.
Prospects for the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms for effective resolution of civil disputes
Abstract
The article examines the main direction of the modern model’s formation of justice in Ukraine regarding sustainable development, the need to support and develop strong and peaceful institutions, and adaptation of Ukrainian legislation to EU law. Based on the analysis of existing approaches, the use of artificial intelligence for the development of tools that analyse large data sets of the Unified the State Register of Court Decisions to identify stable regularities in the judicial system’s functioning will be possible through the development of systems and assessment of risks to achieve the desired outcome of civil cases, increase the percentage of funds awarded, ensure the effective use of public funds for the maintenance of the judiciary in the state, and promote its growth equally across levels in society. The study showed that it is necessary to determine the indicators of the justice system’s efficient functioning and the main factors affecting their efficient consideration of civil cases by the court, as well as the reasons for the risk of excessive length in court proceedings, non-enforcement of court decisions, and high court costs. The findings show that it is necessary to develop a catalogue of information from the analysed cases by taking into account the legal proceedings’ administrative performance indicators in civil cases, as well as the identification of their main and significant factors affecting the effectiveness of legal proceedings and the derivation of quantitative and effective indicators.
About Authors
Vladyslava Turkanova
PhD Student, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine turkanova@knu.ua
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8345-6681
Competing interests: The executive head of the project is Prof. Iryna Izarova, who serves as an Editor-in-Chief of AJEE; though she was not involved in decision-making on this publication and review. Disclaimer: The author declares that her opinion and views expressed in this manuscript are free of any impact of any organizations.
Managing editor – Mag. Polina Siedova. English Editor – Nicole Robinson.
Copyright: © 2023 Vladyslava Turkanova. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
References
- Flejszar R, Izarova I and Vėbraitė V, ‘Access Towards Small Claims Justice: A Comparative Study of Civil Procedure in Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine’ (2019) 9 (1) International Journal of Procedural Law 97.
- Izarova I and Vėbraitė V, ‘Towards Effective Resolution of Medical Disputes in Ukraine and Lithuania: Comparison of Analyses, Challenges and Prospects’ in Maydannyk R, den Exter A and Izarova I (eds), Ukrainian Legislation in the Field of Health Care in the Context of European and International Law (Springer Cham 2022) 153, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05690-1_9.
- Izarova I, ‘Sustainable Civil Justice through Open Law Enforcement: The Ukrainian Experience’ (2020) 9 (5) Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 206, doi: 10.36941/ ajis-2020-0098.
- Izarova I, Krychyna A, Mukha Y and Tsybulko A, ‘On the Way of Implementing the Principle of Best Interests of the Child During Mediation: Ukrainian Experience’ (2022) 1 Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Legal Studies 40, doi: 10.17721/1728-2195/2022/1.120-8.
- Izarova I, Vebraite V and Fleishar R, ‘Case Management in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study of the Legislation of Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine’ (2018) 10 Law of Ukraine 129, doi: 0.33498/ louu-2018-10-129.
Khotynska-Nor O and Izarova I, ‘To reach sustainable justice with Millennials’: Example of Ukraine’ (2022) 12 (4) Juridical Tribune 457, doi: 10.24818/TBJ 2022/12/4.02.
- Khotynska-Nor O, ‘Judicial Transparency: Towards Sustainable Development in Post-Soviet Civil Society’(2022) 5 (2) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 83, doi: 10.33327/AJEE-18-5.2-n000212.Korol DA, ‘Differentiation of Civil Court Proceedings’ (PhD (Law) thesis, Institute of Law of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University 2020).
- Korotenko TF, ‘Court Orders in the Civil Process of Ukraine Addressed to the Competent Authorities of Foreign Countries’ (PhD (Law) thesis, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, VM Koretsky Institute of State and Law 2021).
Lubiana KA, ‘Participation of a Lawyer in the Simplified Civil Court Proceedings of Ukraine’ (PhD (Law) thesis, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University 2021).
- Medvedeva M, Wieling M and Vols M, ‘Rethinking the Field of Automatic Prediction of Court Decisions’ (2023) 31 Artificial Intelligence and Law 195, doi: 10.1007/s10506-021-09306-3.
- Nekrošius V, Vėbraitė V, Izarova I and Prytyka Yu, ‘Legal, Social and Cultural Prerequisites for the Development of ADR Forms in Lithuania and Ukraine’ (2020) 116 Taze (Law) 8, doi: 10.15388/ Teise.2020.116.1.
- Oldak TV, ‘Class Action in the Civil Proceedings of Ukraine’ (PhD (Law) thesis, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs 2023).
- Polishchuk MJ, ‘Mediation as a Method of Resolving Civil Legal Disputes’ (PhD (Law) thesis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv 2017).
- Potapenko AV, Determination by the court of an effective way of protecting a private right and interest that does not conflict with the law (LLC 7BC 2022).
- Prytyka Yu and Izarova I, ‘Simplified Civil Litigation of Ukraine: Challenges of the First Year of Application in Judicial Practice’ (2019) 145 Problems of Legality 51, doi: 10.21564/2414- 990x.145.160567.
- Spektor OM, ‘Alternative Methods of Resolving Civil Legal Disputes’ (PhD (Law) thesis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv 2012).
- Stefanchuk M, ‘Modern Trends in the Formation and Development of the Human Rights Mechanism in Ukraine’ (2022) 5 (3) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 19, doi: 10.33327/AJEE- 18-5.3-a000311.
- Terekh О, ‘Alternative Ways to Resolve Labour Disputes: Practice of Ukraine and the EU’ (2020) 2 Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Legal Studies 61, doi: 10.17721/1728- 2195/2020/2.113-12.
- Tsuvina T and Vakhonieva T, ‘Law of Ukraine “On Mediation”: Main Achievements and Further Steps of Developing Mediation in Ukraine’ (2022) 5 (1) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 142, doi: 10.33327/AJEE-18-5.1-n000104.
- Ustiushenko SE, ‘Legal Fees in Ukrainian Civil Proceeding’ (PhD (Law) thesis, National University “Odesa Law Academy” 2021).
- van Rhee CH, ‘Mandatory Mediation before Litigation in Civil and Commercial Matters: A European Perspective’ (2021) 4 (4) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 7, doi: 10.33327/AJEE- 18-4.4-a000082.
- van Rhee CH, Maan E and Kostur R, Monitoring of Implementation of the Civil and Commercial Procedural Codes: Final Report (Project Pravo-Justice, EU 2019).
- Vasylyna N, ‘Prospects for the Development of the Dispute Resolution Institute with the Participation of a Notary’ (2020) 1 Bulletin of the Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine 20.
Reviews for article
Add a Review
Keywords
- indicators of efficiency of the judicial system; factors influencing the effectiveness of dispute resolution; court case information catalogue; forecasting the results of court proceedings
Publication history
-
Submitted on 01 Mar 2023 / Revised: 19 Apr 2023 / Approved: 20 Apr 2023 / Published online: 04 May 2023 // Last Published: 15 May 2023
How to cite it?
-
V Turkanova ‘Prospects for the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms for effective resolution of civil disputes’ 2023 2(19) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 232-241. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-6.2-n000224