ISSN 2663-0583 (Online)
ISSN 2663-0575 (Print)
  • Home
  • IN SEARCH OF EFFECTIVE SCENARIOS FOR PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS FOR THE UN AND NATO
"

IN SEARCH OF EFFECTIVE SCENARIOS FOR PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS FOR THE UN AND NATO

Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Criteria for Peacekeeping. – 3. The Influence of Peacekeeping on Conflict and Its Effectiveness. – 4. Open Databases of the World Bank, UN Department of Peacekeeping – Data and Examples of State Situations. – 5. Regularities that Influenced the Effectiveness of Peacekeeping and Post-conflict Stabilisation. – 6. Conclusions.

Full Text:

DOI

Abstract About Author(s) References Reviews

Abstract


Peacekeeping operations are considered one of the main tools for negotiating conflicts and are used by the international community to renew and keep international peace and security. The practice of peacekeeping activities has faced fundamental changes that have influenced its aims and principles. That is why the effectiveness of modern peacekeeping operations and operations for peace maintenance, as an answer to global challenges, need further assessment and explanations. The article aims to 1) characterise peacekeeping activities and principles and assess their effectiveness; 2) determine the main problems in the function of peacekeeping mechanisms; identify optimal methods for the future peacekeeping operations of the UN and NATO.

This study proposes a complex systematisation of present approaches, assessing the effectiveness of both peacekeeping operations and operations for the maintenance of peace. The key goal is to develop optimal scenarios for peacekeeping missions.

The practical importance of the research is the frameworks and conclusions that can be used as methodical recommendations in the work of international organisations that regulate peacekeeping activities. 

About Authors

 Nina Rzhevska

PhD (Political Science), Head of the Department of International Relations and Information and Regional Studios, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine n.rzhevska@kubg.edu.ua  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0963-1311 
Corresponding author, responsible for writing the original draft, conceptualization, formal analysis, and supervision. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that the descriptions and the manuscript are accurate and agreed by all authors. 
Competing interests: The author declares that there is no potential conflict of interest related to the article. 
Disclaimer: The author declares that her opinion and views expressed in this manuscript are free of any impact of any organizations.

Andriy Moroz
Cand. of Political Science (Equiv. PhD), Associate Professor at the Department of International Relations and Information and Regional Studios, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine andrii.moroz@nau.edu.ua  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2614-6027 
Co-author, responsible for writing, review, and editing, methodology, validation, and formal analysis.  
Competing interests: The author declares that there is no potential conflict of interest related to the article. 
Disclaimer: The author declares that his opinion and views expressed in this manuscript are free of any impact of any organizations.

Translation: The content of this article was translated with the participation of third parties under the authors’ supervision. 


Managing editor – Dr Serhii Kravtsov. English Editor – Dr Sarah White.


Copyright: © 2022 N Rzhevska, A Moroz. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

 Bellamy A J, Williams P D, Griffin S, ‘Understanding peacekeeping’ (2015) 3 PP 75, 80.

Sopilko I N, ‘Formation of cybersafety policy (Ukrainian experience)’ (2013) 27 WASJ 371, 374.

Weaver L, UN Peacekeeping: Lessons Learned in Managing Recent Missions (DIANE Publishing 2014).

Durch D J, Holt V K, Earle C R, Shanahan M K, UN Peace Operations (The Henry L Stimson Centre 2017).

Koops J, MacQueen N, Tardy T, Williams P D, Oxford Handbook of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations (OUP 2015).

Richmond O, ‘The problem of peace: understanding the “liberal peace”’ (2006) 6 JCSD 291, 314.

Roy A L, Malcorra S, The New Horizon Initiative: Progress Report No. 6. (United Nations Peacekeeping 2017).

Hultman L, Kathman J, Shannon M, ‘Beyond keeping peace: United Nations. Effectiveness in the midst of fighting’ (2014) 108 APS Rev 737, 753; 

Salvatore J D, ‘The effectiveness of peacekeeping operations’ (2017) 4 OUP 36, 37. 

Ruggeri A, Dorussen H, Gizelis T-I, ‘Winning the peace locally: UN peacekeeping and local conflict’ (2017) 71 JCR 86, 87.

Beardsley K, Gledisch K S, ‘Peacekeeping as conflict containment’ (2021) 17 ISR 67, 89.

Heldt B, Wallensteen P, ‘Peacekeeping operations: global patterns of intervention and success’ (2006) 2 FBAP 32.

Pouligny B, Peace Operations Seen from Below: UN Missions and Local People (Kumarian Press 2006) 

Autesserre S, The trouble with the Congo (Cambridge University Press 2010) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761034

Autesserre S, Peaceland (2014) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280366

Autesserre S, Frontlines of Peace (Oxford University Press 2021).

Collier P, Hoefer A, Soderbom M, ‘Post-conflict risks’ (2008) 45 JPR <https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6250412.pdf> accessed 2 February 2022.

Hegre H, Hultman L, Nygard HM, ‘Evaluating the conflict-reducing effect of UN peacekeeping’ (2018) 81 JP 215, 232.

Abilova O, Novosseloff A, Demystifying Intelligence in UN Peace Operations: Toward an Organizational Doctrine Novosseloff(International Peace Institute 2016).

Kreps S, Why does peacekeeping succeed or fail? Peacekeeping in the democratic republic of Congo and Sierra Leone. In modern war and the utility of force: challenges, methods, and strategy (Routledge 2010).

Williams A, Bexfield J, Fitzgerald F, Johannes de Nijs F, NATO operations assessment handbook: recent developments in measuring results in conflict environments (NATO Communications and Information Agency 2015).

Aksit C (ed), Allied joint doctrine for operational level planning. The development, concept and doctrine centre (NATO standardization office 2002).

Bercovitch J, Jackson R, ‘Conflict resolution in the twenty-first century: principles, methods, and approaches’ (2014) 2 Univ M Pr 238.

Yost D S, NATO’s balancing act united states institute of peace (United States Institute of Peace Press 2014).

Lipson M, ‘Performance under ambiguity: international organization performance in un peacekeeping’ (2018) 13 RIO 630.

Daalder I H, NATO, the UN, and the Use of Force (Report Brookings Institution 1999) <https://www.brookings.edu/research/nato-the-un-and-the-use-of-force/> accessed 2 February 2022.

Reviews for article

Add a Review

Reviews are moderated and will be published after verification!
All comments not related to reviews of the article will be deleted!

 

Keywords

  • peacekeeping; peacekeeping operations; peacekeeping effectiveness; UN and NATO peacekeeping operation scenarios

How to cite it?

  •  Rzhevska,  N,  Moroz A ‘In Search of Effective Scenarios for Peacekeeping Operations for the UN and NATO’ 2022 3(15) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 87-106. DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18-5.3-n000319