Summary: 1. Introduction. – 2. Judiciary Regulation in Ukraine and the Theoretical Dogmas. – 3. Two Views on the ‘Court’ Concept and Their Implementation in Ukraine. – 4. The 2016 Judiciary Reform in Ukraine in the Light of the EU Ukraine Association Agreement. – 4.1. The System of Courts. – 4.2. Status of Judges. – 4.3. Related Institutions of the Judiciary. – 5. Ukraine and International Courts’ Jurisdiction: A Challenge to National Sovereignty? – 6. Ukrainian Justice under Internal Separatist Terror and External Military Aggression. – 7. The Global COVID-19 Pandemic as a New Challenge to Ukraine’s Justice. – 8. Concluding Remarks.
Thirty years after the declaration of its independence, Ukraine, unfortunately, has not yet managed to modernize its legal system to a level of proper efficiency. This is largely due to the dichotomy of the previous international strategy of our state between the two vectors of development, the old eastern and the new western one, which actually retarded the movement forward. The contradiction between these views on the prospects of Ukraine’s development of the younger generation and the generation that continued to carry the memory of its historical past, was no less significant. Corruption is deeply rooted in the system of public administration and was purposefully supported by internal and external opponents of Ukraine’s independence and overcoming these relics is a fundamental task in asserting sovereignty.